GS vs. LRCX
GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, GS returned 24.48%/yr vs 48.23%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GS vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 22.08% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 114.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 24.48%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.23% annualized return.
GS
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 49.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 28.83%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 312.75%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
GS vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 22.08% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GS and LRCX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999 | 0.44 |
Fundamentals
GS:
$327.33B
LRCX:
$463.20B
GS:
$57.41
LRCX:
$5.29
GS:
18.51
LRCX:
69.37
GS:
2.40
LRCX:
5.25
GS:
3.02
LRCX:
21.46
GS:
2.66
LRCX:
43.76
GS:
$110.77B
LRCX:
$21.68B
GS:
$61.53B
LRCX:
$10.84B
GS:
$24.94B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GS vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
GS
LRCX
GS vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 15.26 | -11.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 51.20 | -38.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GS vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -87.90% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -20.01% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -47.10% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -56.39% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.75% | -56.39% | +7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | 0.00% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -28.17% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 5.95% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GS vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is 11.84%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 21.52%. This indicates that GS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 21.52% | -9.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 43.63% | -20.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.55% | 52.78% | -24.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.10% | 46.57% | -18.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.87% | 44.92% | -15.05% |
Dividends
GS vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than LRCX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
GS vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GS vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GS and LRCX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to GS (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GS and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer