GROZ vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GROZ (Zacks Focus Growth ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GROZ is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past year, GROZ returned 29.02% vs 19.65% for PFM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GROZ charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

GROZ vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GROZ having a 8.57% return and PFM slightly lower at 8.18%.

GROZ

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 29.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GROZ vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF	8.57%	20.28%	-1.80%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	-3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GROZ and PFM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	0.62

The correlation between GROZ and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GROZ vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GROZ

GROZ Risk / Return Rank: 51
GROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
GROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GROZ vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GROZ	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.09	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.07	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.78	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	11.28	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GROZ vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GROZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GROZ and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GROZ	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.09	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.53	+0.31

Drawdowns

GROZ vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GROZ drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GROZ and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GROZ	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.33%	-53.21%	+29.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-7.09%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.23%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.06%	-6.94%	+2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	1.75%	+1.94%

Volatility

GROZ vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that GROZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GROZ	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.04%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	7.13%	+4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	9.47%	+5.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	13.54%	+8.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	15.21%	+6.74%

GROZ vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GROZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

GROZ vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

GROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GROZ and PFM in my portfolio?

GROZ and PFM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GROZ or PFM?

GROZ has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GROZ dropped -23.33% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, GROZ or PFM?

On 1-year performance, GROZ leads with 29.02% vs 19.65% for PFM. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GROZ or PFM?

Over the 1-year period, GROZ has performed better with a 29.02% return vs 19.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GROZ or PFM?

PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for GROZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GROZ or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.04% for GROZ.

What is the main difference between GROZ and PFM?

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GROZ and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.