GRN vs. TILL
GRN (iPath Series B Carbon ETN) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. GRN is passively managed, while TILL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GRN returned -2.34%/yr vs -8.91%/yr for TILL. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.
Performance
GRN vs. TILL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -6.37% return, which is significantly lower than TILL's 2.85% return.
GRN
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- -6.37%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
TILL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- -8.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRN vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | -6.37% | 20.33% | -7.34% | -2.99% | -10.91% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.85% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRN and TILL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRN vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank
GRN
TILL
GRN vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRN | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.96 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | -0.41 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | -0.80 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRN vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -47.96%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and TILL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRN | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.96% | -33.76% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.39% | -9.60% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.33% | -29.46% | -14.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -30.98% | +13.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.55% | -21.48% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.04% | 4.93% | +7.11% |
Volatility
GRN vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison
iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) at 2.83%. This indicates that GRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRN | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 2.83% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | 10.35% | +14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.76% | 12.65% | +15.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 14.69% | +25.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.82% | 14.69% | +27.13% |
GRN vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRN vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison
GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.83% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRN and TILL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRN has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to TILL (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRN dropped -47.96% vs TILL's -33.76%.
On 3-year performance, GRN leads with -2.34% vs -8.91% for TILL. On fees, GRN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GRN has performed better with a -2.34% return vs -8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for GRN.
They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRN and 0.89% for TILL.
GRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRN and TILL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer