PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREZX vs. GGBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREZX achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly lower than GGBZX's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GREZX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 3.71%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.


GREZX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
7.00%
6M
7.25%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
3.71%

GGBZX

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.90%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.75%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
7.00%8.53%2.87%11.06%-27.58%27.23%-4.84%24.44%-4.88%10.74%
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.38%19.62%15.45%20.67%-19.61%14.95%15.47%26.93%-10.15%25.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GREZX and GGBZX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.70

The correlation between GREZX and GGBZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREZX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREZX
GREZX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GREZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GREZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GGBZX
GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GREZXGGBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

2.45

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

10.63

-6.68

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the GGBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREZX and GGBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GREZXGGBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.95

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.57

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.70

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.41

-0.31

Drawdowns

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREZX drawdown since its inception was -77.41%, which is greater than GGBZX's maximum drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREZX and GGBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREZXGGBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.41%

-57.68%

-19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-10.02%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-16.21%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-28.31%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

-33.03%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-0.78%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-9.23%

-9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.30%

+0.36%

Volatility

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREZXGGBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.70%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

9.97%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

12.56%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

15.46%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

16.46%

+0.75%

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREZX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREZX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison

GREZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than GGBZX's 10.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.48%11.57%3.37%3.51%13.16%7.72%6.01%12.14%3.94%7.18%9.55%27.06%
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
3.39%3.63%2.39%2.97%0.57%4.32%2.36%7.50%4.40%3.94%4.33%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREZX and GGBZX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGBZX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GREZX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREZX dropped -77.41% vs GGBZX's -57.68%.

GGBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREZX and GGBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer