PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREZX vs. GGBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREZX achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than GGBFX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GREZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


GREZX

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
7.42%
6M
7.23%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
3.75%

GGBFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
7.42%8.53%2.87%11.06%-27.58%27.23%-4.84%24.44%-4.88%10.74%
GGBFX
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund
0.38%7.55%0.40%5.77%-13.90%-2.57%5.03%11.04%-4.74%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GREZX and GGBFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.32

Over the past year, GREZX and GGBFX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREZX
GREZX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GREZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GREZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GGBFX
GGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GREZXGGBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.04

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.87

3.30

+0.57

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the GGBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREZX and GGBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GREZXGGBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.97

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.10

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.39

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.71

-0.62

Drawdowns

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREZX drawdown since its inception was -77.41%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREZX and GGBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREZXGGBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.41%

-27.03%

-50.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-3.80%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-6.01%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-20.84%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

-20.97%

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-3.85%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-4.64%

-13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.19%

+1.46%

Volatility

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund (GREZX) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.50%. This indicates that GREZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREZXGGBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

1.50%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

3.15%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

4.07%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

4.97%

+10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

4.51%

+12.71%

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREZX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison

GREZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGBFX
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund
3.05%3.05%2.88%1.10%0.95%3.55%1.44%3.29%3.13%3.45%3.96%4.01%
GREZX
GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund
3.38%3.63%2.39%2.97%0.57%4.32%2.36%7.50%4.40%3.94%4.33%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREZX and GGBFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GREZX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to GGBFX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREZX dropped -77.41% vs GGBFX's -27.03%.

GGBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREZX and GGBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer