GQQQ vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQQQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Astoria, while CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GQQQ returned 31.34% vs 0.01% for CCOR. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's 1.40% return.

GQQQ

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 17.66%
• YTD: 20.73%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.85%

CCOR

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: -2.63%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: -0.96%
• 5Y*: -1.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.50K	$56.93K	$78.52K
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	$376.02K	$626.74K	$598.32K

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	20.73%	17.37%	1.52%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.40%	3.52%	-6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and CCOR is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQQQ

GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 67
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 10
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQQQ	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	0.00	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	0.06	+2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.01	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	0.00	+2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	0.00	+10.87

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQQQ and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQQQ	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-22.99%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-8.79%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-15.78%	+14.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-7.47%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	4.19%	-1.30%

Volatility

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.00%. This indicates that GQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQQQ	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	3.00%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.43%	6.47%	+8.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.45%	8.23%	+10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.78%	11.19%	+9.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.78%	10.77%	+10.01%

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQQQ vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CCOR's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.45%	0.46%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQQQ and CCOR in my portfolio?

GQQQ and CCOR have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQQQ or CCOR?

GQQQ has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to CCOR (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQQQ dropped -22.36% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, GQQQ or CCOR?

On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 31.34% vs 0.01% for CCOR. On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GQQQ or CCOR?

Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 31.34% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQQQ or CCOR?

GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQQQ or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.45% for GQQQ.

What is the main difference between GQQQ and CCOR?

GQQQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while CCOR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.