GQQQ vs. ALTL
GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQQQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Astoria, while ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. GQQQ is actively managed, while ALTL is passively managed. Over the past year, GQQQ returned 28.41% vs 19.44% for ALTL. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ALTL.
Performance
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQQQ achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly higher than ALTL's 7.55% return.
GQQQ
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- YTD
- 16.19%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.47%
ALTL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.76K | $387.58K | $319.94K | |
| $400.11K | $656.11K | $581.68K |
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 16.19% | 17.37% | 1.52% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 7.55% | 16.61% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQQQ and ALTL is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between GQQQ and ALTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQQQ vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank
GQQQ
ALTL
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GQQQ | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.21 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 4.51 | +4.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and ALTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQQQ | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -31.91% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -14.23% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -10.79% | +5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -11.42% | +8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.82% | -0.94% |
Volatility
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is 5.96%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that GQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQQQ | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 9.45% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 17.73% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.34% | 22.63% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.49% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 20.73% | 0.00% |
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQQQ vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison
GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ALTL's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.95% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% |
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQQQ and ALTL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALTL has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to GQQQ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQQQ dropped -22.36% vs ALTL's -31.91%.
On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 28.41% vs 19.44% for ALTL. On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 28.41% return vs 19.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.
ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.47% for GQQQ.
GQQQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while ALTL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.60% for ALTL.
GQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQQQ and ALTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer