GQQQ vs. QQQ
GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQQQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Astoria, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past year, GQQQ returned 40.82% vs 41.82% for QQQ. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GQQQ having a 21.53% return and QQQ slightly lower at 21.30%.
GQQQ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 21.53% | 17.37% | 2.66% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQQQ and QQQ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GQQQ and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQQQ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GQQQ
QQQ
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQQQ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.62 | 2.64 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 3.45 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.51 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.65 | 13.49 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQQQ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.41 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQQQ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.36% | -82.97% | +60.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -11.96% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.26% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -32.79% | +29.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 3.11% | -0.65% |
Volatility
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQQQ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.49% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 12.10% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 15.94% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 22.38% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 22.29% | -2.07% |
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQQQ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GQQQ and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GQQQ has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQQQ dropped -22.36% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 41.82% vs 40.82% for GQQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 41.82% return vs 40.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GQQQ.
GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
GQQQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQQQ and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer