PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQQQ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GQQQ having a 21.71% return and QQQ slightly lower at 21.30%.


GQQQ

1D
0.47%
1M
8.77%
YTD
21.71%
6M
20.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
21.71%17.37%2.66%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and QQQ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.97

The correlation between GQQQ and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQQQ
GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQQQQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.64

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

3.45

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.51

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.42

13.49

+3.93

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQQQ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQQQQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.64

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.41

+0.88

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQQQQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-82.97%

+60.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-11.96%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-32.79%

+29.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.11%

-0.65%

Volatility

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQQQQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.49%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

12.10%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

15.94%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

22.38%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

22.29%

-2.05%

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQQQ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
0.40%0.46%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GQQQ and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GQQQ has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQQQ dropped -22.36% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 42.08% vs 41.82% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 42.08% return vs 41.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GQQQ.

GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

GQQQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.18% for QQQ.

GQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQQQ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer