PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPZ vs. SMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPZ vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than SMHX's 78.44% return.


GPZ

1D
-4.70%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-16.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMHX

1D
0.94%
1M
33.64%
YTD
78.44%
6M
72.62%
1Y
139.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPZ vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GPZ and SMHX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.46

GPZ vs. SMHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPZ
SMHX

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

GPZ
100.0%
SMHX

-

Real Estate

GPZ
2.3%
SMHX

-

Basic Materials

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Communication Services

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Consumer Cyclical

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Consumer Defensive

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Energy

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Healthcare

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Industrials

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Technology

GPZ

-

SMHX
100.0%

Utilities

GPZ

-

SMHX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPZ vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPZ

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPZ vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPZ vs. SMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPZSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

1.94

-2.38

Drawdowns

GPZ vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum SMHX drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and SMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPZSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-38.53%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

0.00%

-25.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-7.33%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

Volatility

GPZ vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPZSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

32.69%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.33%

39.97%

-12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

39.97%

-12.64%

GPZ vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SMHX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPZ vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison

GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SMHX's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
1.03%0.83%0.00%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.01%0.02%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPZ and SMHX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GPZ.

GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.01% for SMHX.

GPZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while SMHX is Semiconductors. GPZ tracks MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 0.35% for SMHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPZ and SMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer