PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GPZ vs. FNCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GPZ vs. FNCL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck ETF Trust (GPZ) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL).

GPZ and FNCL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPZ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2025. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both GPZ and FNCL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GPZ vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck ETF Trust (GPZ) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GPZ vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
GPZ
VanEck ETF Trust		-20.90%9.43%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF		-9.17%10.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -20.90% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's -9.17% return.

GPZ

1D
2.65%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-20.90%
6M
-21.63%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FNCL

1D
2.23%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-9.17%
6M
-7.18%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck ETF Trust

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

Often compared with GPZ:
GPZ vs. RAAXGPZ vs. CEFGPZ vs. PSPGPZ vs. GDLCGPZ vs. REMXGPZ vs. GDXJGPZ vs. IPRV.L
Often compared with FNCL:
FNCL vs. XLFFNCL vs. VFHFNCL vs. FIDSXFNCL vs. FSPCXFNCL vs. FTECFNCL vs. KBEFNCL vs. FCOM

GPZ vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.

GPZ
VanEck ETF Trust
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

Return for Risk

GPZ vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GPZ
FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPZ vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck ETF Trust (GPZ) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPZ vs. FNCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GPZFNCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.14

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.48

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.55

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.52

-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between GPZ and FNCL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GPZ vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FNCL's 1.75% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPZ
VanEck ETF Trust		1.05%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF		1.75%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%

Drawdowns

GPZ vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum FNCL drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and FNCL.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GPZFNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-44.38%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-14.78%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.68%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.34%

-11.94%

-15.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-6.89%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

4.92%

—

Volatility

GPZ vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GPZFNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.88%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.75%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.76%

20.02%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.76%

19.34%

+7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.76%

22.35%

+4.41%