GPZ vs. REMX
GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
GPZ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 33.01% return.
GPZ
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 6M
- -16.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 33.01%
- 6M
- 37.14%
- 1Y
- 172.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
GPZ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.37% | 9.43% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 33.01% | 92.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPZ and REMX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.25 |
GPZ vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPZ
REMX
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GPZ
REMX
-
Real Estate
GPZ
REMX
-
Basic Materials
GPZ
-
REMX
Communication Services
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Consumer Defensive
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Energy
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Healthcare
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Industrials
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Technology
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Utilities
GPZ
-
REMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPZ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
GPZ
REMX
GPZ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.08 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
GPZ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -90.20% | +58.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.93% | -54.98% | +29.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -66.87% | +55.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility
GPZ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPZ | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.33% | 48.11% | -20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 40.24% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 36.94% | -9.61% |
GPZ vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPZ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than REMX's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.32% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPZ and REMX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.03% for GPZ.
GPZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while REMX is Materials. GPZ tracks MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for GPZ and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer