GPZ vs. CEF
GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and CEF (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) are both funds - GPZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while CEF is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. GPZ is passively managed, while CEF is actively managed. Over the past year, GPZ returned -11.53% vs 35.34% for CEF. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CEF.
Performance
GPZ vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.30% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's -9.78% return.
GPZ
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -19.30%
- 6M
- -20.44%
- 1Y
- -11.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEF
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -12.70%
- YTD
- -9.78%
- 6M
- -12.85%
- 1Y
- 35.34%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
GPZ vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.30% | 9.24% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | -9.78% | 52.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPZ and CEF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPZ vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
GPZ
CEF
GPZ vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPZ | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.19 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.18 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 2.94 | -3.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPZ vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and CEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPZ | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -62.29% | +30.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.72% | -30.21% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.87% | -30.21% | +4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -27.33% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 12.06% | +3.74% |
Volatility
GPZ vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is 9.25%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that GPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPZ | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | 10.98% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 36.46% | -14.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 39.22% | -11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 24.62% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 22.02% | +5.58% |
GPZ vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPZ vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPZ and CEF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEF has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to GPZ (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPZ dropped -31.72% vs CEF's -62.29%.
CEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPZ and CEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer