GPSTX vs. GMSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX).
GPSTX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. GMSMX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund | -6.18% | 19.64% | 17.49% | 24.10% | -22.19% | 19.33% | 19.40% | 25.67% | -10.35% | 21.98% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | -3.07% | 8.76% | 11.29% | 17.73% | -18.23% | 24.45% | 21.98% | 23.25% | -9.38% | 14.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPSTX achieves a -6.18% return, which is significantly lower than GMSMX's -3.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GPSTX having a 10.28% annualized return and GMSMX not far behind at 9.87%.
GPSTX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
GMSMX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPSTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GMSMX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPSTX vs. GMSMX — Risk / Return Rank
GPSTX
GMSMX
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPSTX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.67 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.09 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.14 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.89 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 3.41 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPSTX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.67 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.20 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.46 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.27 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPSTX and GMSMX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Dividend Comparison
GPSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than GMSMX's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund | 5.06% | 4.75% | 4.45% | 2.00% | 4.13% | 2.65% | 1.82% | 1.11% | 1.40% | 12.56% | 4.21% | 2.98% |
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 7.13% | 6.91% | 9.08% | 0.67% | 2.29% | 11.71% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 6.72% | 34.90% | 0.28% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum GMSMX drawdown of -70.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSTX and GMSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPSTX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -70.55% | +37.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -13.52% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -28.90% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -41.31% | +8.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -9.22% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -14.93% | +9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.53% | -0.98% |
Volatility
GPSTX vs. GMSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) is 5.21%, while GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that GPSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPSTX | GMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 5.99% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 12.28% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 21.42% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 20.81% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 21.67% | -4.42% |