GPSTX vs. GMLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX).
GPSTX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Apr 28, 2011. GMLGX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund | -6.18% | 19.64% | 17.49% | 24.10% | -22.19% | 19.33% | 19.40% | 25.67% | -10.35% | 21.98% |
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | -7.74% | 14.26% | 22.35% | 25.27% | -19.10% | 26.33% | 22.21% | 28.12% | -5.53% | 20.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPSTX achieves a -6.18% return, which is significantly higher than GMLGX's -7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GPSTX has underperformed GMLGX with an annualized return of 10.28%, while GMLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
GPSTX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
GMLGX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -7.74%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPSTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GMLGX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPSTX vs. GMLGX — Risk / Return Rank
GPSTX
GMLGX
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPSTX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.68 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.11 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.79 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 3.58 | +1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPSTX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.68 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.35 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPSTX and GMLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Dividend Comparison
GPSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than GMLGX's 20.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund | 5.06% | 4.75% | 4.45% | 2.00% | 4.13% | 2.65% | 1.82% | 1.11% | 1.40% | 12.56% | 4.21% | 2.98% |
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | 20.04% | 18.49% | 4.20% | 0.75% | 10.27% | 3.03% | 0.38% | 1.01% | 2.22% | 4.25% | 2.99% | 3.08% |
Drawdowns
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum GMLGX drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSTX and GMLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPSTX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -56.56% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -12.82% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -25.54% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -35.15% | +1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -9.59% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -9.51% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.84% | -0.29% |
Volatility
GPSTX vs. GMLGX - Volatility Comparison
GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) at 4.02%. This indicates that GPSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPSTX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.02% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 9.05% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 18.53% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.62% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 18.63% | -1.38% |