PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPSTX vs. GMWEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPSTX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than GMWEX's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GPSTX has outperformed GMWEX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while GMWEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


GPSTX

1D
1.98%
1M
-1.12%
6M
6.80%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
11.44%
ALL TIME*
10.16%

GMWEX

1D
2.51%
1M
2.43%
6M
7.16%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
9.04%
ALL TIME*
3.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPSTX
GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund
9.55%19.64%17.49%24.10%-22.19%19.33%19.40%25.67%-10.35%21.98%
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
11.14%33.60%5.36%15.97%-16.19%11.70%8.58%20.02%-14.12%25.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSTX and GMWEX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.88

The correlation between GPSTX and GMWEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPSTX vs. GMWEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPSTX
GPSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GPSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GPSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GMWEX
GMWEX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GMWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPSTXGMWEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.28

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

8.77

-0.75

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GMWEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPSTX and GMWEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum GMWEX drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSTX and GMWEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPSTXGMWEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.18%

-70.00%

+36.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.42%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-12.52%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.30%

-31.28%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

-35.51%

+2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

0.00%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-30.82%

+25.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.70%

-0.36%

Volatility

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) is 4.02%, while GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that GPSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPSTXGMWEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.43%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.62%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

14.87%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

15.78%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.00%

+1.32%

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GMWEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPSTX vs. GMWEX - Dividend Comparison

GPSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GMWEX's 13.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
13.18%14.64%2.94%3.43%3.11%1.08%2.01%1.66%1.61%1.43%1.86%2.70%
GPSTX
GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund
4.34%4.75%4.45%2.00%4.13%2.65%1.82%1.11%1.40%12.56%4.21%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPSTX and GMWEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWEX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to GPSTX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPSTX dropped -33.18% vs GMWEX's -70.00%.

GMWEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPSTX and GMWEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer