GMSMX vs. GMLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX).
GMSMX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. GMLGX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001.
Performance
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | -3.07% | 8.76% | 11.29% | 17.73% | -18.23% | 24.45% | 21.98% | 23.25% | -9.38% | 14.46% |
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | -7.74% | 14.26% | 22.35% | 25.27% | -19.10% | 26.33% | 22.21% | 28.12% | -5.53% | 20.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMSMX achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly higher than GMLGX's -7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GMSMX has underperformed GMLGX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while GMLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
GMSMX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
GMLGX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -7.74%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMSMX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GMLGX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMSMX vs. GMLGX — Risk / Return Rank
GMSMX
GMLGX
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMSMX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.79 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 3.58 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMSMX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.52 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.35 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMSMX and GMLGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Dividend Comparison
GMSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, less than GMLGX's 20.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 7.13% | 6.91% | 9.08% | 0.67% | 2.29% | 11.71% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 6.72% | 34.90% | 0.28% | 2.83% |
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund | 20.04% | 18.49% | 4.20% | 0.75% | 10.27% | 3.03% | 0.38% | 1.01% | 2.22% | 4.25% | 2.99% | 3.08% |
Drawdowns
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMSMX drawdown since its inception was -70.55%, which is greater than GMLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMSMX and GMLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMSMX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.55% | -56.56% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -12.82% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -25.54% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.31% | -35.15% | -6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.22% | -9.59% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.93% | -9.51% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.84% | +0.69% |
Volatility
GMSMX vs. GMLGX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) at 4.02%. This indicates that GMSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMSMX | GMLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 4.02% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 9.05% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 18.53% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 17.62% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 18.63% | +3.04% |