GMSMX vs. GMWEX
GMSMX (GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund) and GMWEX (GuideMark World ex-US Fund) are both mutual funds - GMSMX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by GuideMark, while GMWEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by GuideMark. Over the past 10 years, GMSMX returned 11.81%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for GMWEX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMSMX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for GMWEX.
Performance
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMSMX achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly higher than GMWEX's 8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GMSMX has outperformed GMWEX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while GMWEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.91% annualized return.
GMSMX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 18.39%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
GMWEX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 18.39% | 8.76% | 11.29% | 17.73% | -18.23% | 24.45% | 21.98% | 23.25% | -9.38% | 14.46% |
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | 8.00% | 33.60% | 5.36% | 15.97% | -16.19% | 11.70% | 8.58% | 20.02% | -14.12% | 25.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMSMX and GMWEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GMSMX and GMWEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMSMX vs. GMWEX — Risk / Return Rank
GMSMX
GMWEX
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) and GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMSMX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 2.16 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 8.22 | +3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMSMX drawdown since its inception was -70.55%, roughly equal to the maximum GMWEX drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMSMX and GMWEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMSMX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.55% | -70.00% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -10.42% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.90% | -12.52% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -31.28% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.31% | -35.51% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.46% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -30.95% | +16.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.73% | +0.09% |
Volatility
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund (GMSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) at 4.67%. This indicates that GMSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMSMX | GMWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 4.67% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 12.17% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 14.67% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 15.75% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 16.23% | +5.55% |
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMSMX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GMWEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMSMX vs. GMWEX - Dividend Comparison
GMSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than GMWEX's 13.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMSMX GuideMark Small/Mid Cap Core Fund | 5.84% | 6.91% | 9.08% | 0.67% | 2.29% | 11.71% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 6.72% | 34.90% | 0.28% | 2.83% |
GMWEX GuideMark World ex-US Fund | 13.56% | 14.64% | 2.94% | 3.43% | 3.11% | 1.08% | 2.01% | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 1.86% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMSMX and GMWEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMSMX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to GMWEX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMSMX dropped -70.55% vs GMWEX's -70.00%.
GMSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMSMX and GMWEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer