GPROX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
GPROX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2013. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | -8.35% | 8.87% | 5.51% | 14.86% | -34.54% | 19.78% | 41.16% | 29.39% | -15.86% | 30.73% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPROX achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GPROX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 7.52%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
GPROX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -8.03%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPROX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPROX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
GPROX
FGIAX
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPROX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.75 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 2.26 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.61 | -2.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 12.12 | -11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPROX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.75 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.80 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPROX and FGIAX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
GPROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.48%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | 21.48% | 19.69% | 12.03% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 15.32% | 8.09% | 2.58% | 11.25% | 1.49% | 0.13% | 3.75% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPROX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPROX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPROX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.86% | -49.35% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -8.29% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.86% | -21.08% | -22.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.86% | -38.02% | -5.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.60% | -3.78% | -20.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -7.22% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.78% | +1.78% |
Volatility
GPROX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that GPROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPROX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 4.05% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 7.09% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 12.28% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 13.08% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 15.17% | +1.78% |