GPROX vs. GPGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX).
GPROX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2013. GPGCX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Sep 16, 2019.
Performance
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | -6.17% | 8.87% | 5.51% | 14.86% | -34.54% | 19.78% | 41.16% | 10.18% |
GPGCX Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund | -4.50% | 20.03% | 14.97% | 21.28% | -14.60% | 20.00% | 24.99% | 9.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPROX achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly lower than GPGCX's -4.50% return.
GPROX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -5.50%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.97%
- 5Y*
- -1.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
GPGCX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -1.96%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPROX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GPGCX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPROX vs. GPGCX — Risk / Return Rank
GPROX
GPGCX
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPROX | GPGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.51 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.18 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 4.10 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPROX | GPGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.58 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.82 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPROX and GPGCX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Dividend Comparison
GPROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.98%, more than GPGCX's 16.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | 20.98% | 19.69% | 12.03% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 15.32% | 8.09% | 2.58% | 11.25% | 1.49% | 0.13% | 3.75% |
GPGCX Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund | 16.39% | 15.65% | 7.19% | 1.92% | 2.98% | 5.88% | 1.70% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPROX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, which is greater than GPGCX's maximum drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPROX and GPGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPROX | GPGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.86% | -37.17% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -13.17% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.86% | -25.70% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.80% | -10.92% | -11.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -6.36% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.78% | -0.16% |
Volatility
GPROX vs. GPGCX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Fund (GPGCX) at 6.27%. This indicates that GPROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPROX | GPGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 6.27% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 10.36% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 15.85% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 14.17% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 16.14% | +0.82% |