GOOW vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

GOOW vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 16.06% return.

GOOW

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 6M: 15.73%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	20.63%	75.51%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.06%	11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and QDTE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.57

GOOW vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GOOW	QDTE
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	5.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GOOW vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 79
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOW	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.71	1.29	+2.42

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOW	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.88%	-22.86%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.28%	-0.60%	-8.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-3.14%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOOW	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.56%	14.81%	+22.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.56%	18.42%	+19.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.56%	18.42%	+19.14%

GOOW vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOW vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, less than QDTE's 43.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.69%	19.77%	0.00%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.41%	49.49%	32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOW and QDTE in my portfolio?

GOOW and QDTE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOOW or QDTE?

On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOW or QDTE?

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOW or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 33.69% for GOOW.

What is the main difference between GOOW and QDTE?

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.97% for QDTE.