GOOG vs. FLTR
GOOG (Alphabet Inc) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 10 years, GOOG returned 25.03%/yr vs 3.52%/yr for FLTR. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GOOG vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOG has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 25.03%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.52% annualized return.
GOOG
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 85.45%
- 3Y*
- 39.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.84%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M | |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | $7.78B | $6.87B | $7.98B |
GOOG vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 13.80% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -38.67% | 65.17% | 31.03% | 29.10% | -1.03% | 35.58% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOG and FLTR is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2014 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOG vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GOOG
FLTR
GOOG vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 2.96 | -1.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 16.15 | -12.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | 95.31 | -83.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOG vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -17.84% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.75% | -0.31% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.35% | -1.93% | -27.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.60% | -3.06% | -41.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | -17.84% | -26.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.57% | 0.00% | -10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -0.67% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.44% | 0.05% | +7.39% |
Volatility
GOOG vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.17%. This indicates that GOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 0.17% | +12.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.59% | 0.65% | +23.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 0.80% | +30.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 2.13% | +29.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 5.00% | +24.34% |
Dividends
GOOG vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FLTR's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.63% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOG and FLTR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOG has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOG and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer