GOOG vs. FANG
GOOG (Alphabet Inc) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. GOOG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GOOG returned 26.05%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FANG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOOG vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 33.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOG has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 26.05%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.
GOOG
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 107.32%
- 3Y*
- 43.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.94%
- 10Y*
- 26.05%
FANG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 33.36%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 22.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
GOOG vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 15.25% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -38.67% | 65.17% | 31.03% | 29.10% | -1.03% | 35.58% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 33.36% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOG and FANG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between GOOG and FANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GOOG:
$4.42T
FANG:
$56.05B
GOOG:
$13.11
FANG:
$1.40
GOOG:
27.54
FANG:
141.45
GOOG:
10.44
FANG:
3.75
GOOG:
9.23
FANG:
1.54
GOOG:
$422.57B
FANG:
$15.19B
GOOG:
$255.12B
FANG:
$7.30B
GOOG:
$174.08B
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOG vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
GOOG
FANG
GOOG vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.24 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.20 | 3.58 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.68 | 7.07 | +11.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 1.43 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.60 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.23 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.47 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
GOOG vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -88.72% | +44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.75% | -12.53% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.35% | -42.10% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.60% | -42.10% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | -88.72% | +44.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -6.74% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -19.39% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 6.33% | -0.56% |
Volatility
GOOG vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) is 8.43%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that GOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOG | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 11.35% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.50% | 23.88% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.74% | 31.51% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 37.98% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 49.06% | -20.04% |
Dividends
GOOG vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FANG's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.09% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GOOG vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOOG vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
GOOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
GOOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
GOOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOG and FANG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to GOOG (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs FANG's -88.72%.
GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOG and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer