PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOM vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.57% return.


GMOM

1D
0.24%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.82%
6M
13.95%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
7.62%

JMOM

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.73%
YTD
22.57%
6M
21.71%
1Y
36.34%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
11.82%20.63%6.75%0.65%-2.82%19.13%2.42%8.24%-9.61%4.01%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.57%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOM and JMOM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.53

The correlation between GMOM and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GMOM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GMOM
JMOM

Energy

20.7%
3.8%

Industrials

16.1%
12.8%

Basic Materials

15.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
9.6%

Utilities

11.0%
2.3%

Technology

8.4%
38.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
6.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.5%

Healthcare

1.1%
8.7%

Energy

GMOM
20.7%
JMOM
3.8%

Industrials

GMOM
16.1%
JMOM
12.8%

Basic Materials

GMOM
15.6%
JMOM
1.3%

Financial Services

GMOM
12.0%
JMOM
9.6%

Utilities

GMOM
11.0%
JMOM
2.3%

Technology

GMOM
8.4%
JMOM
38.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GMOM
5.4%
JMOM
6.9%

Communication Services

GMOM
4.1%
JMOM
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

GMOM
3.5%
JMOM
5.7%

Real Estate

GMOM
2.2%
JMOM
2.5%

Healthcare

GMOM
1.1%
JMOM
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOM
GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMOMJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.64

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

21.99

-9.87

GMOM vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOM and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOMJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.55

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

GMOM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOMJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-34.31%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-7.87%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-19.51%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-28.26%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.35%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-6.31%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.66%

+0.78%

Volatility

GMOM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) is 3.23%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that GMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMOMJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

4.56%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

11.56%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

14.31%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

18.65%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.82%

20.13%

-7.31%

GMOM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
1.58%3.01%2.16%3.63%2.52%3.42%1.24%2.60%1.90%2.05%1.77%1.88%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.72%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to GMOM (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.24% vs 7.06% for GMOM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GMOM has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.24% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.

GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.12% for JMOM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOM and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer