GMOM vs. BUFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR).
GMOM and BUFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMOM is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. BUFR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 10, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GMOM or BUFR.
Key characteristics
| GMOM | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.98% | 13.17% |
| 1Y Return | 13.66% | 20.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.00% | 8.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.96 | 3.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.39 | 4.27 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.63 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.72 | 2.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.29 | 21.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.62% | 0.95% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.44% | 6.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.03% | -13.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.13% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and BUFR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GMOM vs. BUFR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than BUFR's 13.17% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMOM vs. BUFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFR's 1.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GMOM vs. BUFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GMOM vs. BUFR - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 3.34% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% | 1.09% |
BUFR FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. BUFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than BUFR's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and BUFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GMOM vs. BUFR - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR) at 1.30%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.