PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOM vs. BUFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMOM vs. BUFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMOM vs. BUFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
8.03%20.63%6.75%0.65%-2.82%19.13%8.17%
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
-0.93%12.44%14.68%19.63%-7.57%11.88%7.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than BUFR's -0.93% return.


GMOM

1D
1.13%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
8.03%
6M
12.16%
1Y
28.42%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
7.31%

BUFR

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
1.42%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMOM vs. BUFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMOM vs. BUFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOM
GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFR
BUFR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BUFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOM vs. BUFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMOMBUFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.26

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

1.83

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.63

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.60

9.16

+2.44

GMOM vs. BUFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the BUFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOM and BUFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOMBUFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.26

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.85

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.96

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between GMOM and BUFR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GMOM vs. BUFR - Dividend Comparison

GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
1.63%3.01%2.16%3.63%2.52%3.42%1.24%2.60%1.90%2.05%1.77%1.88%
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GMOM vs. BUFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than BUFR's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and BUFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOMBUFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-13.73%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-8.76%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-13.73%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-2.30%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-2.15%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.56%

+0.93%

Volatility

GMOM vs. BUFR - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) at 3.48%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMOMBUFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

3.48%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

5.24%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

11.11%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

10.46%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

10.33%

+2.43%