GMOM vs. IMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL).
GMOM and IMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMOM is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GMOM or IMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and IMFL is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GMOM vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GMOM:
0.59
IMFL:
-0.21
GMOM:
0.90
IMFL:
-0.20
GMOM:
1.11
IMFL:
0.98
GMOM:
0.52
IMFL:
-0.28
GMOM:
3.08
IMFL:
-0.68
GMOM:
2.86%
IMFL:
4.39%
GMOM:
15.03%
IMFL:
14.07%
GMOM:
-25.02%
IMFL:
-33.25%
GMOM:
-7.48%
IMFL:
-10.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than IMFL's -0.60% return.
GMOM
0.46%
-3.25%
-1.88%
8.18%
4.69%
3.56%
IMFL
-0.60%
-4.36%
-7.94%
-3.12%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMOM vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GMOM vs. IMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GMOM
IMFL
GMOM vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GMOM vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than IMFL's 3.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 2.14% | 2.15% | 3.63% | 2.51% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% | 1.09% |
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.58% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.36% | 3.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and IMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GMOM vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) at 3.60%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.