PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. GDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. GDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMOD

1D
-1.79%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDT

1D
-3.52%
1M
-7.76%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and GDT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOD vs. GDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMODGDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

-0.80

+2.57

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and GDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODGDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-18.56%

+12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-18.56%

+16.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-10.05%

+8.89%

Volatility

GMOD vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODGDTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.95%

33.50%

-24.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

33.50%

-24.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

33.50%

-24.55%

GMOD vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOD vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than GDT's 1.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GMOD and GDT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.30% for GDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and GDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer