GMOD vs. WAMA
GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GMOD is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
GMOD vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GMOD
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | -1.01% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOD and WAMA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOD vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.62 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
GMOD vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -2.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -2.80% | -3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.80% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -0.50% | -0.66% |
Volatility
GMOD vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOD | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 12.92% | -3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 12.92% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 12.92% | -3.97% |
GMOD vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOD vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOD and WAMA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.
GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for GMOD and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer