GMOD vs. QLTI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and QLTI (GMO International Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by GMO, while QLTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by GMO. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QLTI.

Performance

GMOD vs. QLTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than QLTI's 0.96% return.

GMOD

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 5.04%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLTI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: -1.23%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. QLTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	7.50%	4.35%
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF	0.96%	3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and QLTI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

GMOD vs. QLTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLTI

QLTI Risk / Return Rank: 16
QLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
QLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
QLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
QLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOD vs. QLTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOD	QLTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.26	—

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. QLTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum QLTI drawdown of -14.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and QLTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOD	QLTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-14.82%	+8.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-4.57%	+4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-3.84%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOD	QLTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.83%	15.53%	-6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.83%	16.56%	-7.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.83%	16.56%	-7.73%

GMOD vs. QLTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QLTI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOD vs. QLTI - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than QLTI's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.37%	0.93%	0.00%
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF	0.61%	0.52%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOD and QLTI in my portfolio?

GMOD and QLTI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOD or QLTI?

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOD or QLTI?

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QLTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOD or QLTI?

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.61% for QLTI.

What is the main difference between GMOD and QLTI?

GMOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QLTI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.60% for QLTI.