GMOD vs. TBFG
GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
GMOD vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than TBFG's 7.51% return.
GMOD
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 5.74% | 3.87% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 7.51% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOD and TBFG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOD vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
GMOD
TBFG
GMOD vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOD | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.25 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
GMOD vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOD | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -13.43% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.92% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -1.63% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility
GMOD vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOD | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 10.11% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 11.07% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 11.07% | -2.12% |
GMOD vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOD vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than TBFG's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.00% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.41% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GMOD and TBFG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.42% for TBFG.
Find the right allocation for GMOD and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer