GMED vs. PIPR
GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.) and PIPR (Piper Sandler Companies) are both stocks. GMED operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while PIPR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GMED returned 12.86%/yr vs 25.74%/yr for PIPR. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GMED vs. PIPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -9.76% return, which is significantly lower than PIPR's -8.81% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has underperformed PIPR with an annualized return of 12.86%, while PIPR has yielded a comparatively higher 25.74% annualized return.
GMED
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.68%
PIPR
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- 6M
- -10.56%
- YTD
- -8.81%
- 1Y
- -1.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.13%
- 5Y*
- 23.58%
- 10Y*
- 25.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $96.46M | $126.87M | $149.45M | |
| $44.97M | $47.30M | $48.12M |
GMED vs. PIPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | -9.76% | 5.56% | 55.21% | -28.25% | 2.87% | 10.70% | 10.77% | 36.04% | 5.30% | 65.66% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | -8.81% | 15.52% | 74.24% | 37.78% | -23.41% | 85.33% | 29.64% | 23.88% | -20.69% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMED and PIPR is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
GMED:
$10.63B
PIPR:
$5.12B
GMED:
$4.28
PIPR:
$3.95
GMED:
18.39
PIPR:
19.17
GMED:
0.19
PIPR:
1.27
GMED:
3.48
PIPR:
2.70
GMED:
2.30
PIPR:
4.02
GMED:
$3.10B
PIPR:
$2.00B
GMED:
$1.58B
PIPR:
$1.95B
GMED:
$803.34M
PIPR:
$455.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMED vs. PIPR — Risk / Return Rank
GMED
PIPR
GMED vs. PIPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMED | PIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.02 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | -0.06 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | -0.11 | +5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMED vs. PIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum PIPR drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and PIPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMED | PIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -76.97% | +29.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -24.56% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.40% | -38.78% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.91% | -42.30% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.91% | -63.02% | +15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.62% | -18.06% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -30.53% | +15.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 12.26% | -2.13% |
Volatility
GMED vs. PIPR - Volatility Comparison
Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) have volatilities of 12.47% and 12.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMED | PIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 12.04% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.28% | 28.10% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.44% | 35.36% | +14.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.45% | 35.45% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 36.57% | -1.16% |
Dividends
GMED vs. PIPR - Dividend Comparison
GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 2.61% | 1.68% | 1.17% | 2.09% | 5.30% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 4.74% | 1.45% |
Financials
GMED vs. PIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Piper Sandler Companies. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GMED vs. PIPR - Profitability Comparison
GMED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a gross profit of 456.39M and revenue of 475.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
GMED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
PIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported an operating income of 88.67M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
GMED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
PIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a net income of 65.24M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMED and PIPR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMED has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to PIPR (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMED dropped -47.91% vs PIPR's -76.97%.
GMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMED and PIPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer