GMED vs. FVRR
GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.) and FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) are both stocks. GMED operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while FVRR operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, GMED returned -1.08%/yr vs -48.60%/yr for FVRR. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GMED vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -9.76% return, which is significantly higher than FVRR's -54.81% return.
GMED
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.68%
FVRR
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -18.15%
- 6M
- -46.69%
- YTD
- -54.81%
- 1Y
- -59.56%
- 3Y*
- -32.86%
- 5Y*
- -48.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.18M | $8.33M | $8.87M | |
| $96.46M | $126.87M | $149.45M |
GMED vs. FVRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | -9.76% | 5.56% | 55.21% | -28.25% | 2.87% | 10.70% | 10.77% | 43.30% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -54.81% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -41.72% | 730.21% | -9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMED and FVRR is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GMED and FVRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GMED:
$10.63B
FVRR:
$321.04M
GMED:
$4.28
FVRR:
$0.82
GMED:
18.39
FVRR:
10.93
GMED:
0.19
FVRR:
0.05
GMED:
3.48
FVRR:
0.78
GMED:
2.30
FVRR:
0.75
GMED:
$3.10B
FVRR:
$418.35M
GMED:
$1.58B
FVRR:
$343.03M
GMED:
$803.34M
FVRR:
$67.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMED vs. FVRR — Risk / Return Rank
GMED
FVRR
GMED vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMED | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.78 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | -0.90 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | -1.36 | +6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMED vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum FVRR drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and FVRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMED | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -97.24% | +49.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -66.52% | +44.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.40% | -74.81% | +30.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.91% | -96.18% | +48.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.62% | -97.24% | +78.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -68.21% | +52.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 43.69% | -33.56% |
Volatility
GMED vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) is 12.47%, while Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a volatility of 26.74%. This indicates that GMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMED | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 26.74% | -14.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.28% | 47.39% | -21.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.44% | 54.13% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.45% | 64.83% | -26.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 71.15% | -35.74% |
Dividends
GMED vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GMED nor FVRR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GMED vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globus Medical, Inc. and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GMED vs. FVRR - Profitability Comparison
GMED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FVRR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 79.93M and revenue of 97.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.
GMED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
FVRR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
GMED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
FVRR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 4.47M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMED and FVRR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (26.74%) compared to GMED (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMED dropped -47.91% vs FVRR's -97.24%.
GMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMED and FVRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer