FVRR vs. NTLA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA).

Performance

FVRR vs. NTLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FVRR vs. NTLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd.	-49.29%	-37.72%	16.57%	-6.59%	-74.37%	-41.72%	730.21%	-41.10%
NTLA Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.	42.60%	-22.90%	-61.76%	-12.61%	-70.49%	117.35%	270.82%	1.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FVRR : $367.42M NTLA : $1.39B
EPS FVRR : $0.57 NTLA : -$3.84
PB Ratio FVRR : 0.89 NTLA : 2.07
Total Revenue (TTM) FVRR : $430.91M NTLA : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) FVRR : $349.81M NTLA : -$34.30M
EBITDA (TTM) FVRR : $20.33M NTLA : -$322.22M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -49.29% return, which is significantly lower than NTLA's 42.60% return.

FVRR

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -7.48%
• YTD: -49.29%
• 6M: -58.95%
• 1Y: -57.69%
• 3Y*: -34.04%
• 5Y*: -46.33%
• 10Y*: —

NTLA

• 1D: 10.04%
• 1M: -6.97%
• YTD: 42.60%
• 6M: -25.77%
• 1Y: 80.31%
• 3Y*: -29.93%
• 5Y*: -30.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FVRR vs. NTLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVRR

FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 5
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8

NTLA

NTLA Risk / Return Rank: 66
NTLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
NTLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NTLA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NTLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NTLA Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVRR vs. NTLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVRR	NTLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.26	0.80	-2.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.08	1.60	-3.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.23	-0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	0.83	-1.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	1.48	-3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVRR vs. NTLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the NTLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and NTLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVRR	NTLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.26	0.80	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.73	-0.38	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	-0.07	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and NTLA is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FVRR vs. NTLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVRR nor NTLA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. NTLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -96.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NTLA drawdown of -96.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and NTLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVRR	NTLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.98%	-96.45%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.11%	-71.27%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.23%	-96.45%	+0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.90%	-92.75%	-4.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.84%	-56.41%	-10.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.72%	39.85%	-2.13%

Volatility

FVRR vs. NTLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) is 11.85%, while Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a volatility of 21.45%. This indicates that FVRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVRR	NTLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.85%	21.45%	-9.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.54%	84.99%	-51.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.01%	102.02%	-56.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.88%	80.71%	-16.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.32%	78.28%	-9.96%

Financials