PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVRR vs. ROKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FVRR vs. ROKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -46.46% return, which is significantly lower than ROKU's 17.17% return.


FVRR

1D
-7.60%
1M
-12.92%
YTD
-46.46%
6M
-49.76%
1Y
-67.88%
3Y*
-26.96%
5Y*
-44.31%
10Y*

ROKU

1D
-1.48%
1M
2.86%
YTD
17.17%
6M
29.37%
1Y
74.11%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
-17.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVRR vs. ROKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
-46.46%-37.72%16.57%-6.59%-74.37%-41.72%730.21%-41.10%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
17.17%45.94%-18.90%125.21%-82.16%-31.27%147.96%27.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and ROKU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.50

The correlation between FVRR and ROKU shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FVRR:

$387.24M

ROKU:

$19.20B

EPS

FVRR:

$0.78

ROKU:

$1.34

PE Ratio

FVRR:

13.62

ROKU:

95.18

PS Ratio

FVRR:

0.91

ROKU:

3.86

PB Ratio

FVRR:

0.92

ROKU:

7.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

FVRR:

$429.22M

ROKU:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FVRR:

$348.84M

ROKU:

$2.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

FVRR:

$33.15M

ROKU:

$280.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVRR vs. ROKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVRR
FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKU
ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVRR vs. ROKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVRRROKUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.43

1.68

-3.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.74

2.19

-4.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

1.29

-0.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

2.72

-3.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.43

7.77

-9.20

FVRR vs. ROKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the ROKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and ROKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVRRROKUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.43

1.68

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

-0.26

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.29

-0.55

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. ROKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -96.98%, which is greater than ROKU's maximum drawdown of -91.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and ROKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVRRROKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.98%

-91.91%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.11%

-27.69%

-43.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.47%

-51.65%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.23%

-91.91%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.73%

-73.49%

-23.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-52.78%

-14.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.01%

9.71%

+37.30%

Volatility

FVRR vs. ROKU - Volatility Comparison

Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a higher volatility of 14.31% compared to Roku, Inc. (ROKU) at 7.96%. This indicates that FVRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVRRROKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.31%

7.96%

+6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.79%

31.30%

+6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.58%

44.36%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.03%

66.62%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.11%

73.41%

-5.30%

Dividends

FVRR vs. ROKU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVRR nor ROKU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FVRR vs. ROKU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiverr International Ltd. and Roku, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
105.49M
1.25B
(FVRR) Total Revenue
(ROKU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FVRR vs. ROKU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiverr International Ltd. and Roku, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.4%
45.2%
Portfolio components
FVRR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

ROKU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.

FVRR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

ROKU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

FVRR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

ROKU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FVRR and ROKU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVRR has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to ROKU (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -96.98% vs ROKU's -91.91%.

ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVRR and ROKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer