GLTR vs. RISR
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond. GLTR is passively managed, while RISR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLTR returned 29.97%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for RISR. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.
Performance
GLTR vs. RISR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 3.07% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
RISR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | 3.46% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 3.07% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 31.98% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and RISR is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
RISR
GLTR vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.83 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 4.33 | -1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and RISR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -14.31% | -41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.09% | -2.61% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.09% | -8.07% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.27% | -0.44% | -30.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -2.17% | -26.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 1.10% | +12.76% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.30%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 1.30% | +9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.24% | 3.98% | +32.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 5.45% | +32.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 11.82% | +12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 11.82% | +8.82% |
GLTR vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.91% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and RISR have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to RISR (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs RISR's -14.31%.
On 3-year performance, GLTR leads with 29.97% vs 10.98% for RISR. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 29.97% return vs 10.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 1.13% for RISR.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and RISR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer