PortfoliosLab logo
RISR vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RISR and DBMF is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

RISR vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
80.31%
19.14%
RISR
DBMF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RISR:

1.66

DBMF:

-0.82

Sortino Ratio

RISR:

2.52

DBMF:

-1.03

Omega Ratio

RISR:

1.31

DBMF:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

RISR:

3.46

DBMF:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

RISR:

10.06

DBMF:

-0.93

Ulcer Index

RISR:

1.43%

DBMF:

9.26%

Daily Std Dev

RISR:

8.65%

DBMF:

10.58%

Max Drawdown

RISR:

-14.31%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

RISR:

-1.26%

DBMF:

-13.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's -2.03% return.


RISR

YTD

2.76%

1M

1.53%

6M

7.27%

1Y

13.34%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DBMF

YTD

-2.03%

1M

0.47%

6M

-2.78%

1Y

-10.90%

5Y*

4.99%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RISR vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for RISR: current value is 1.13%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RISR: 1.13%
Expense ratio chart for DBMF: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DBMF: 0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RISR vs. DBMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RISR is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RISR is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RISR is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RISR is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RISR is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RISR is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RISR vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RISR, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RISR: 1.66
DBMF: -0.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for RISR, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RISR: 2.52
DBMF: -1.03
The chart of Omega ratio for RISR, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RISR: 1.31
DBMF: 0.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for RISR, currently valued at 3.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RISR: 3.46
DBMF: -0.52
The chart of Martin ratio for RISR, currently valued at 10.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RISR: 10.06
DBMF: -0.93

The current RISR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISR and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.66
-0.82
RISR
DBMF

Dividends

RISR vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than DBMF's 5.99% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.59%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.99%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

RISR vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.26%
-13.73%
RISR
DBMF

Volatility

RISR vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 3.00%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.48%
3.00%
RISR
DBMF