GLTR vs. QTUM
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTR returned 14.04%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
GLTR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 39.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | 9.63% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and QTUM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
QTUM
GLTR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.46 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 5.46 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 19.77 | -16.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -38.45% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.09% | -15.26% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.09% | -25.39% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.09% | -38.45% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.27% | -4.42% | -26.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -8.24% | -20.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 4.21% | +9.65% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 10.43%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 14.18% | -3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.24% | 23.17% | +13.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.40% | 28.39% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 26.99% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 27.40% | -6.76% |
GLTR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 14.04% for GLTR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while QTUM is Technology Equities. GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer