GLTR vs. IGLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD).
GLTR and IGLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. IGLD is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 2, 2021.
Performance
GLTR vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLTR vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -3.91% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 5.99% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 5.99% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
IGLD
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 38.18%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
IGLD
GLTR vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.62 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.25 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 9.68 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.62 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.05 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.05 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and IGLD is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLTR vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.45%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 12.45% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and IGLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -18.59% | -37.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -17.56% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -18.59% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | -11.57% | -11.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -5.01% | -23.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.54% | 4.08% | +4.46% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 11.19%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 11.19% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.75% | 21.21% | +14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 23.75% | +13.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 14.90% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 14.86% | +5.42% |