GLTR vs. GLDW
GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. GLTR is passively managed, while GLDW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
GLTR vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's 1.00% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 53.06%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 1.47% | 18.57% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and GLDW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
GLDW
GLTR vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.42 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -23.59% | -32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.86% | -22.51% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -8.93% | -19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | — | — |
Volatility
GLTR vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.58% | 36.90% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 36.90% | -13.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 36.90% | -16.40% |
GLTR vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GLTR and GLDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer