PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTR vs. GLDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTR vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's 1.00% return.


GLTR

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
1.47%
6M
10.73%
1Y
53.06%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
13.17%

GLDW

1D
-1.20%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
1.00%
6M
3.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and GLDW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTR vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR
GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTRGLDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

GLTR vs. GLDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTRGLDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.42

-0.10

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GLDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTRGLDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.70%

-23.59%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.86%

-22.51%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.83%

-8.93%

-19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.88%

Volatility

GLTR vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTRGLDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.58%

36.90%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

36.90%

-13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

36.90%

-16.40%

GLTR vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLTR vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GLTR and GLDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.99% for GLDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTR and GLDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer