GLTR vs. GLDW
GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. GLTR is passively managed, while GLDW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
GLTR vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLDW's -10.18% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- -22.36%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.70%
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -21.62%
- YTD
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $259.24K | $286.30K | $479.68K | |
| $15.88M | $12.93M | $13.80M |
GLTR vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -11.69% | 21.17% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -10.18% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and GLDW is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
GLDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLTR vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -32.55% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -31.08% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -13.26% | -15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.83% | — | — |
Volatility
GLTR vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.52% | 35.85% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 35.85% | -11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 35.85% | -15.05% |
GLTR vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLTR vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 26.73% | 3.75% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GLTR and GLDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 26.73%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer