GLDW vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

GLDW and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Oct 30, 2025. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

GLDW vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDW vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	8.62%	7.63%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	7.21%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLDW having a 8.62% return and GLDM slightly lower at 8.57%.

GLDW

• 1D: 4.69%
• 1M: -13.64%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

GLDW

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDW	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	1.09	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and GLDM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GLDW vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	12.11%	3.75%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-21.63%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.66%	-13.19%	-3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-6.04%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.26%	27.57%	+13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.26%	17.65%	+23.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.26%	16.77%	+24.49%