GLTR vs. ABBNY
GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while ABBNY (ABB Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GLTR returned 12.31%/yr vs 21.38%/yr for ABBNY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than ABBNY's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has underperformed ABBNY with an annualized return of 12.31%, while ABBNY has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.67%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 30.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
ABBNY
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 41.80%
- 6M
- 43.11%
- 1Y
- 82.41%
- 3Y*
- 41.86%
- 5Y*
- 27.12%
- 10Y*
- 21.38%
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -3.01% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
ABBNY ABB Ltd | 41.80% | 40.49% | 23.75% | 49.62% | -18.13% | 40.40% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -26.52% | 31.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and ABBNY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010 | 0.24 |
The correlation between GLTR and ABBNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. ABBNY — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
ABBNY
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and ABB Ltd (ABBNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | ABBNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.49 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 5.27 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 20.73 | -17.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | ABBNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.79 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.05 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum ABBNY drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and ABBNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | ABBNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -93.98% | +38.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.10% | -15.71% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.10% | -20.26% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.10% | -36.07% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.10% | -43.98% | +13.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.08% | -5.13% | -24.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -25.54% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.25% | 3.99% | +9.26% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 9.50%, while ABB Ltd (ABBNY) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | ABBNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 10.45% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.83% | 24.58% | +11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.04% | 29.78% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 26.06% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 25.43% | -4.86% |
Dividends
GLTR vs. ABBNY - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBNY ABB Ltd | 1.18% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 2.07% | 2.88% | 2.29% | 2.77% | 3.31% | 4.35% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 4.21% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLTR and ABBNY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBNY has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to GLTR (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs ABBNY's -93.98%.
ABBNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLTR and ABBNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer