PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABBNY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABBNY
ABB Ltd
14.33%40.49%23.75%49.62%-18.13%40.40%21.21%31.87%-26.52%31.68%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBNY achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBNY has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 19.64%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


ABBNY

1D
3.55%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
14.33%
6M
16.83%
1Y
62.57%
3Y*
36.92%
5Y*
24.83%
10Y*
19.64%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABBNY
ABBNY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ABBNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABBNY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

0.92

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

1.41

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.41

+2.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.54

6.61

+9.93

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABBNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBNY and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABBNY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

0.92

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.61

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.46

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ABBNY and ^GSPC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBNY drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBNY and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABBNY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.98%

-56.78%

-37.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

-12.14%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

-25.43%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.98%

-33.92%

-10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.86%

-5.78%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-10.75%

-14.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

2.60%

+1.36%

Volatility

ABBNY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ABB Ltd (ABBNY) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ABBNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABBNY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

5.37%

+5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

9.55%

+10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

18.33%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

16.90%

+8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

18.05%

+6.95%