GLRY vs. BLES

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. GLRY is actively managed, while BLES is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.85%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for BLES. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BLES.

Performance

GLRY vs. BLES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than BLES's 11.95% return.

GLRY

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 15.36%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

BLES

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. BLES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	16.65%	16.50%	16.59%	19.58%	-22.50%	15.97%	4.13%
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	11.95%	19.25%	5.59%	16.47%	-16.21%	24.36%	0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and BLES is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020	0.80

The correlation between GLRY and BLES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRY vs. BLES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLRY	BLES
Technology	32.3%	15.6%
Industrials	24.6%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	4.5%
Financial Services	10.2%	10.3%
Healthcare	8.1%	5.8%
Utilities	3.0%	5.5%
Real Estate	2.6%	6.9%
Energy	2.5%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	7.8%
Communication Services	1.6%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	3.3%

Return for Risk

GLRY vs. BLES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY

GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 50
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 57
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. BLES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLRY	BLES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.92	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.70	-0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.88	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	10.93	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLRY vs. BLES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the BLES Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and BLES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLRY	BLES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.92	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.45	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.54	-0.02

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. BLES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum BLES drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and BLES.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRY	BLES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.60%	-40.35%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-8.29%	-2.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-15.46%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.63%	-26.61%	-8.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.55%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.05%	-6.05%	-10.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.18%	+0.95%

Volatility

GLRY vs. BLES - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) at 3.61%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRY	BLES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	3.61%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	9.60%	+5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	12.43%	+5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.06%	16.46%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	18.94%	+2.47%

GLRY vs. BLES - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BLES's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRY vs. BLES - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than BLES's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.77%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	0.24%	0.34%	0.52%	1.07%	1.04%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRY and BLES in my portfolio?

GLRY and BLES have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLRY or BLES?

GLRY has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to BLES (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs BLES's -40.35%.

Which ETF is better, GLRY or BLES?

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.85% vs 7.38% for BLES. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLRY or BLES?

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRY or BLES?

BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLRY or BLES?

BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.

What is the main difference between GLRY and BLES?

GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while BLES is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.58% for BLES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.