GLRY vs. INDS
GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. GLRY is actively managed, while INDS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.85%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INDS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.
Performance
GLRY vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.64% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
INDS
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- —
GLRY vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 16.65% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.64% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and INDS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GLRY and INDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLRY vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRY
INDS
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GLRY
INDS
-
Industrials
GLRY
INDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRY
INDS
-
Financial Services
GLRY
INDS
-
Healthcare
GLRY
INDS
-
Utilities
GLRY
INDS
-
Real Estate
GLRY
INDS
Energy
GLRY
INDS
-
Basic Materials
GLRY
INDS
-
Communication Services
GLRY
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
GLRY
INDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
INDS
GLRY vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 0.54 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 0.88 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.76 | +2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 2.29 | +7.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.54 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.04 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -40.17% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -12.23% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -26.96% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | -40.17% | +5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -20.47% | +20.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -15.57% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 4.03% | -0.90% |
Volatility
GLRY vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.50% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 12.14% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 16.23% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 20.16% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 23.11% | -1.70% |
GLRY vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRY vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than INDS's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.54% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRY and INDS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to INDS (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.85% vs 0.85% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while INDS is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.60% for INDS.
GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLRY and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer