PortfoliosLab logo
GLRY vs. TMFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and TMFC is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

GLRY vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
24.68%
65.01%
GLRY
TMFC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLRY:

0.07

TMFC:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

GLRY:

0.25

TMFC:

1.23

Omega Ratio

GLRY:

1.03

TMFC:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

GLRY:

0.07

TMFC:

0.90

Martin Ratio

GLRY:

0.24

TMFC:

3.31

Ulcer Index

GLRY:

6.25%

TMFC:

5.43%

Daily Std Dev

GLRY:

21.44%

TMFC:

22.48%

Max Drawdown

GLRY:

-40.60%

TMFC:

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

GLRY:

-11.20%

TMFC:

-9.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -6.55% return.


GLRY

YTD

-4.45%

1M

2.09%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

2.03%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TMFC

YTD

-6.55%

1M

1.36%

6M

-1.93%

1Y

16.40%

5Y*

17.76%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLRY vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for GLRY: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GLRY: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for TMFC: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMFC: 0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLRY vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLRY is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLRY is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLRY is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLRY is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLRY is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLRY is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFC is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFC is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLRY vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLRY, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GLRY: 0.07
TMFC: 0.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLRY, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GLRY: 0.25
TMFC: 1.23
The chart of Omega ratio for GLRY, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GLRY: 1.03
TMFC: 1.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLRY, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GLRY: 0.07
TMFC: 0.90
The chart of Martin ratio for GLRY, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GLRY: 0.24
TMFC: 3.31

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.07
0.80
GLRY
TMFC

Dividends

GLRY vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than TMFC's 0.43% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.70%0.52%1.07%1.03%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.43%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.62%

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.20%
-9.91%
GLRY
TMFC

Volatility

GLRY vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is 13.50%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that GLRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.50%
15.36%
GLRY
TMFC