PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRY vs. TMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLRY vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLRY vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
3.74%16.50%16.59%19.58%-22.50%15.97%4.13%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
-8.08%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -8.08% return.


GLRY

1D
3.80%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.74%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

TMFC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-8.08%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLRY vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLRY vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY
GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRYTMFCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

0.93

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

1.47

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.52

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.78

5.42

+3.35

GLRY vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRYTMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.93

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.64

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.74

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and TMFC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GLRY vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than TMFC's 0.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.27%0.34%0.52%1.07%1.04%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.16%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and TMFC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRYTMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-33.06%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-12.64%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.63%

-33.06%

-1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-9.95%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-6.88%

-9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.54%

-0.22%

Volatility

GLRY vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 5.76%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLRYTMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

5.76%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

10.52%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.75%

20.21%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

20.43%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

22.14%

-0.66%