GLOW vs. GXTG
GLOW (VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GLOW is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. Over the past year, GLOW returned 23.17% vs -8.62% for GXTG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLOW charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
GLOW vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOW achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than GXTG's -3.20% return.
GLOW
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -4.51%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- 6M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- -8.62%
- 3Y*
- -5.63%
- 5Y*
- -12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
GLOW vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF | 11.80% | 21.29% | 4.44% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -3.20% | 3.52% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLOW and GXTG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between GLOW and GXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLOW vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLOW
GXTG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
Technology
GLOW
GXTG
Financial Services
GLOW
GXTG
Healthcare
GLOW
GXTG
Communication Services
GLOW
GXTG
Industrials
GLOW
GXTG
Consumer Cyclical
GLOW
GXTG
Consumer Defensive
GLOW
GXTG
-
Utilities
GLOW
GXTG
Basic Materials
GLOW
GXTG
Energy
GLOW
GXTG
-
Real Estate
GLOW
GXTG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLOW vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
GLOW
GXTG
GLOW vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLOW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.97 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | -0.35 | +2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | -0.75 | +11.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLOW vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOW drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOW and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLOW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -67.81% | +52.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -24.65% | +15.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -61.74% | +60.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -43.29% | +41.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 11.51% | -9.30% |
Volatility
GLOW vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is 3.20%, while Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that GLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLOW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 10.35% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 23.82% | -13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 29.78% | -16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 28.45% | -13.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 29.96% | -14.80% |
GLOW vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOW has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLOW vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
GLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than GXTG's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF | 1.23% | 1.33% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.55% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLOW and GXTG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to GLOW (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOW dropped -15.58% vs GXTG's -67.81%.
On 1-year performance, GLOW leads with 23.17% vs -8.62% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GLOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLOW has performed better with a 23.17% return vs -8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for GLOW.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.23% for GLOW.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for GLOW and 0.50% for GXTG.
GLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLOW and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer