GLOW vs. UFO
GLOW (VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GLOW is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. Over the past year, GLOW returned 28.17% vs 82.42% for UFO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLOW charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
GLOW vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOW achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 26.05% return.
GLOW
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -21.29%
- YTD
- 26.05%
- 6M
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 82.42%
- 3Y*
- 39.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GLOW vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF | 11.87% | 21.29% | 4.44% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 26.05% | 67.36% | 49.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLOW and UFO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between GLOW and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLOW vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLOW
UFO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GLOW
UFO
Financial Services
GLOW
UFO
Healthcare
GLOW
UFO
-
Communication Services
GLOW
UFO
Industrials
GLOW
UFO
Consumer Cyclical
GLOW
UFO
-
Consumer Defensive
GLOW
UFO
-
Utilities
GLOW
UFO
-
Basic Materials
GLOW
UFO
-
Energy
GLOW
UFO
-
Real Estate
GLOW
UFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLOW vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
GLOW
UFO
GLOW vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLOW | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.94 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 10.01 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLOW vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOW drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOW and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLOW | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -50.33% | +34.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -28.15% | +18.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -28.15% | +27.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -21.81% | +20.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 8.26% | -6.06% |
Volatility
GLOW vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is 4.81%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 19.66%. This indicates that GLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLOW | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 19.66% | -14.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 33.68% | -23.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 40.77% | -27.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 30.63% | -15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 31.16% | -15.87% |
GLOW vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOW has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLOW vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
GLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than UFO's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF | 1.11% | 1.33% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLOW and UFO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (19.66%) compared to GLOW (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOW dropped -15.58% vs UFO's -50.33%.
On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 82.42% vs 28.17% for GLOW. On fees, GLOW is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, GLOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 82.42% return vs 28.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLOW is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
GLOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.34% for UFO.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for GLOW and 0.75% for UFO.
GLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLOW and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer