GLL vs. VCMDX
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and VCMDX (Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while VCMDX is a Commodities fund actively managed by Vanguard. GLL is passively managed, while VCMDX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLL returned -27.32%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for VCMDX. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for VCMDX.
Performance
GLL vs. VCMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than VCMDX's 17.69% return.
GLL
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- -37.98%
- 3Y*
- -37.61%
- 5Y*
- -27.32%
- 10Y*
- -20.81%
- ALL TIME*
- -21.71%
VCMDX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 13.45%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 25.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.14%
GLL vs. VCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 3.56% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -11.45% |
VCMDX Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares | 17.69% | 18.20% | 5.27% | -7.45% | 13.83% | 34.82% | 5.07% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and VCMDX is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | -0.41 |
The correlation between GLL and VCMDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (3 years) to -0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. VCMDX — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
VCMDX
GLL vs. VCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLL | VCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.30 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.95 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 6.58 | -7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLL vs. VCMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than VCMDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and VCMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | VCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | -26.67% | -72.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | -13.39% | -51.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | -13.39% | -74.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | -25.45% | -64.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.71% | -7.49% | -91.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.21% | -10.83% | -74.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.53% | 3.97% | +40.56% |
Volatility
GLL vs. VCMDX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) at 4.31%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | VCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 4.31% | +8.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.47% | 12.65% | +33.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.29% | 15.18% | +40.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 15.88% | +20.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 15.37% | +17.06% |
GLL vs. VCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VCMDX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLL vs. VCMDX - Dividend Comparison
GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VCMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCMDX Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares | 12.92% | 15.21% | 2.19% | 2.50% | 14.21% | 30.56% | 0.50% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and VCMDX have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLL has higher volatility (12.38%) compared to VCMDX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs VCMDX's -26.67%.
VCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLL and VCMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer