PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLL vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLL vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLL vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
-25.47%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-2.12%1.66%-41.47%-26.95%5.39%-23.67%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
5.77%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -25.47% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -24.76%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.


GLL

1D
-3.42%
1M
21.74%
YTD
-25.47%
6M
-41.15%
1Y
-61.72%
3Y*
-43.38%
5Y*
-33.32%
10Y*
-24.76%

SLV

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.46%
YTD
5.77%
6M
58.80%
1Y
122.46%
3Y*
45.50%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
16.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLL vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLL vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLL vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLLSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.13

2.16

-3.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.13

2.23

-4.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.40

-0.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.82

-3.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.39

8.70

-10.10

GLL vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLL Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLL and SLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLLSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.13

2.16

-3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.94

0.69

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.78

0.54

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.25

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between GLL and SLV is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

GLL vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLL nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLL vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and SLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLLSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.24%

-76.28%

-22.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.53%

-42.45%

-29.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.76%

-42.45%

-47.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.76%

-42.81%

-52.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.07%

-35.47%

-63.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.99%

-44.76%

-40.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.20%

13.77%

+30.43%

Volatility

GLL vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a higher volatility of 20.37% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.96%. This indicates that GLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLLSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.37%

16.96%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.49%

57.27%

-10.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.80%

57.07%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.41%

35.27%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.99%

31.35%

+0.64%