GLL vs. CXRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. GLL is passively managed, while CXRN is actively managed. Over the past year, GLL returned -48.24% vs -23.31% for CXRN. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

GLL vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -14.49% return, which is significantly lower than CXRN's -13.42% return.

GLL

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 3.37%
• YTD: -14.49%
• 6M: -18.72%
• 1Y: -48.24%
• 3Y*: -41.46%
• 5Y*: -28.82%
• 10Y*: -23.37%

CXRN

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -21.78%
• YTD: -13.42%
• 6M: -14.31%
• 1Y: -23.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLL vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold	-14.49%	-62.81%	1.85%
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-13.42%	-25.68%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GLL and CXRN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

GLL vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLL

GLL Risk / Return Rank: 2
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 3
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLL vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLL	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	-0.64	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.50	-0.73	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.91	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.93	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	-1.67	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLL vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLL and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLL	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92	-0.64	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.61	-0.06

Drawdowns

GLL vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than CXRN's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and CXRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLL	CXRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.24%	-46.71%	-52.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.10%	-25.27%	-39.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.94%	-46.16%	-52.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.13%	-30.08%	-55.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.74%	13.97%	+27.77%

Volatility

GLL vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 11.07%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLL	CXRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.07%	15.39%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.43%	26.75%	+17.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.38%	36.32%	+16.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.90%	36.90%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.12%	36.90%	-4.78%

GLL vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLL and CXRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

GLL vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.61%	3.30%	0.13%
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLL and CXRN in my portfolio?

GLL and CXRN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLL or CXRN?

CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to GLL (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs CXRN's -46.71%.

Which ETF is better, GLL or CXRN?

On 1-year performance, CXRN leads with -23.31% vs -48.24% for GLL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 11.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLL or CXRN?

Over the 1-year period, CXRN has performed better with a -23.31% return vs -48.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLL or CXRN?

GLL and CXRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLL or CXRN?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.

What is the main difference between GLL and CXRN?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Teucrium.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CXRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.