CXRN vs. WEAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. CXRN is actively managed, while WEAT is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -27.23% vs -4.80% for WEAT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for WEAT.

Performance

CXRN vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -21.39% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 12.27% return.

CXRN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -21.84%
• YTD: -21.39%
• 6M: -23.62%
• 1Y: -27.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WEAT

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -8.68%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: -4.80%
• 3Y*: -14.72%
• 5Y*: -7.07%
• 10Y*: -6.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-21.39%	-25.68%	7.40%
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	12.27%	-17.14%	-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and WEAT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.64

The correlation between CXRN and WEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CXRN vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 2
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 0

WEAT

WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CXRN	WEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	-0.22	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	-0.18	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.98	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	-0.34	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.21	-0.56	-1.66

CXRN vs. WEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the WEAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXRN and WEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -51.11%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and WEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXRN	WEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.11%	-84.32%	+33.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.97%	-14.31%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-46.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.11%	-82.31%	+31.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.67%	-63.17%	+32.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.34%	9.64%	+2.70%

Volatility

CXRN vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) at 4.87%. This indicates that CXRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXRN	WEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.67%	4.87%	+4.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.05%	18.17%	+8.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.39%	22.00%	+14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.73%	30.44%	+6.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.73%	26.78%	+9.95%

CXRN vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

CXRN vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.87%	3.30%	0.13%
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXRN and WEAT in my portfolio?

CXRN and WEAT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXRN or WEAT?

CXRN has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to WEAT (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXRN dropped -51.11% vs WEAT's -84.32%.

Which ETF is better, CXRN or WEAT?

On 1-year performance, WEAT leads with -4.80% vs -27.23% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CXRN or WEAT?

Over the 1-year period, WEAT has performed better with a -4.80% return vs -27.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CXRN or WEAT?

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CXRN or WEAT?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.

What is the main difference between CXRN and WEAT?

CXRN is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while WEAT is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CXRN and 1.91% for WEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.